Weber, Habermas and Transformations of the European State韦伯、哈贝马斯和欧洲国家的转变 rb mobi 在线 下载 lit txt 网盘 pdf

　　This book draws on the writings of Max Weber and Jürgen Habermas to trace the relationship of law and democracy in three configurations of the European state: the liberal state（or Rechtsstaat）, the welfare state（Sozialstaat）, and the emerging supranational polity represented by the European Union. John P. McCormick exposes the tendency of social and political theorists to reach back unreflectively to the past and outlines a new, more appropriate normative-empirical model, the supranational Sektoralstaat, for evaluating prospects for constitutional and social democracy in the EU.

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations

1 Introduction: Theorizing Modern Transformations of Law and Democracy

1 . Critical Theory and Structural Transformations

2. Critical Theory and the Supranational Constellation

3. Chapter Outline

4. Law, Democracy, and State Transformation Today

2, The Historical Logic（s） of Habermas's Critique of Weber's "Sociology of Law"

1. The Fragility of Legal-Rational Legitimacy

2. Moral Underpinnings of Formal Law

3. The Possibility of Rationally Coherent Sozialstaat Law

4. Secularization, Commodification, and History

Excursus: The Transformation of Habermas's Theory of History

5. Philosophy of History and the Sociology of Law

Conclusion

3 The Puzzle of Law, Democracy, and Historical Chang in Weber's "Sociology of Law"

1. The Public-Private Law Distinction and "Modern" Law

2. History as Confirmation/Contestation of Legal Categories

3. Legal History as Contrast/Continuity with the Present

4. Legal Limits on Power: Separation and Application

5. Organizations, Special Law, and the Law of the Land

6. Weber, Law, and Social Change

7. Formal and Substantive Rationalization of Law

8. Formal versus Substantive Law and the Sozialstaat

Conclusion

4 Habermas's Deliberatively Legal Sozialstaat: Democracy，Adjudication, and Reflexive Law

1. Habermas on Language and Law, Lifeworld and System

2. Beyond Formalist and Vitalist Notions of Constitutional Democracy

3. Rational and Democratically Accessible Adjudication

4. Selecting Nineteenth- or Twentieth-Century Paradigms of Law

5. Conceptual Paradigms and Historical Configurations o fLaw

Conclusion

5 Habermas on the EU: Normative Aspirations, Empirical Questions, and Historical Assumptions

1. Global Problems to Be Solved by EU Democracy

2. The History of the State as a Guide to the Present

3. The Form and Content of EU Democracy

4. Critical-Historical Limits of Habermas's Theory of E U Democracy

Conclusion

6 The Structural Transformation to the Supranational Sektoralstaat and Prospects for Democracy in the EU

1. Legal Integration and the Supranationalist Model

2. State Centrism - E U Law Constrained

3. The European Sektoralstaat Model

4. Democracy, the EU Sektoralstaat, and Further Questions

7 Conclusion: Habermas's Philosophy of History and Europe's Future

Index

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Weber, Habermas and Transformations of the European State韦伯、哈贝马斯和欧洲国家的转变在线阅读

在线听书地址：Weber, Habermas and Transformations of the European State韦伯、哈贝马斯和欧洲国家的转变在线收听

在线购买地址：Weber, Habermas and Transformations of the European State韦伯、哈贝马斯和欧洲国家的转变在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

编辑推荐

作者简介

　　John P. McCormick is professor of political science at the University of Chicago. From 1998 to 2003, he taught political theory at Yale University. He has received several fellowships, grants, and awards, including a Fulbright to the Center for European Law & Politics at the University of Bremen in Germany and a Monnet at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. Professor McCormick is the author of Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology（Cambridge, 1997） and the editor of Confronting Mass Democracy and Industrial Technology: German Political and Social Thought from Nietzsche to Habermas（2002）. He has published numerous articles on 20th-century continental legal-political theory and Renaissance political and constitutional thought in scholarly journals such as the American Political Science Review（1992, 1999, 2001, 2006） and Political Theory（1994, 1998, 2001, 2003）.